James, you were addressing my comments that I wrote regarding what you said on a podcast. I only offered you the chance to defend
He's written a whole book explaining this argument. It answers everything. Read it & see if u have any questions left
-
-
He was dishonestly portraying my comments as a response to his book. They weren't. I was addressing what James said.
-
But you're expecting him to defend his points at length when he's done this. You need to read the book.
-
If what he said on the podcast wasn't clear to you & it seems it wasn't. Everyone else seems to get it. Go for the long version.
-
I get what post-theism is. I have no questions about it. I find nothing new or unique in it. I find it therefore worthless.
-
And yet you also see that many atheists already do it & said that like its a good thing.
-
YES! Which makes post-theism worthless and nothing new.
-
They should stop? You think James claimed its newer than the ppl already doing it?
-
No. I don't. He didn't say that and I didn't say he did. I said post-theism is worthless as it offers nothing.
- 18 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I don't have any questions left or interest in the subject. I was on a podcast s/James & addressed everything he said
-
But you're missing the point completely. If you read the book, you'd see that. Thesis defended there.
-
What point have I missed? He took one bit, out of the middle of what I wrote, addressing only one thing he said.
-
Lots of them! One example: you said many atheists already do what he calls posttheism as tho he'd not already said this!
-
No, I said that to point out that post-theism is worthless.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.