No. Its much more to do with conveying social transgressiveness which is the point herer.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @christianjbdev
J.S. Mill would not approve of unreasoned social suasion of that form and I believe we can and should do better.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BeatConfusion @christianjbdev
But it's not unreasoned. There are good reasons for women not being subjected to modesty codes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
We all know that there are motives related to biological fitness behind mate-guarding practices but 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
the justifications are now ideological, cultural & identitarian & we must address them on those grounds.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @christianjbdev
My suggestion would be to presume the best motives (i.e. sincere religious practice) and to engage accordingly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BeatConfusion @christianjbdev
I do presume those motives but am not sure why you think them good?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Gender-specific modesty codes are upheld by the ideology of Islam. Religion leads in restricting women &LGBTs
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @christianjbdev
Absolutely agreed. But an effective critique is focused less on corollaries and more on the core ethics.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
In this case, the core ethic to be demolished is the sexes need to be kept visually and physically apart.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.