What's required is not flipping out at surface phenomena but rather a root and branch critique of the beliefs.
But it's not unreasoned. There are good reasons for women not being subjected to modesty codes.
-
-
We all know that there are motives related to biological fitness behind mate-guarding practices but 1/2
-
the justifications are now ideological, cultural & identitarian & we must address them on those grounds.
-
My suggestion would be to presume the best motives (i.e. sincere religious practice) and to engage accordingly.
-
I do presume those motives but am not sure why you think them good?
-
Gender-specific modesty codes are upheld by the ideology of Islam. Religion leads in restricting women &LGBTs
-
Absolutely agreed. But an effective critique is focused less on corollaries and more on the core ethics.
-
In this case, the core ethic to be demolished is the sexes need to be kept visually and physically apart.
-
The argument should be, in a nutshell, fornication is fun and okay now that we've got the pill and safe abortion
- 11 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.