Sure but I don't see anything to be gained from arguing abt definitions when you could just get down to substance.
But it doesn't mean I have to argue with Michael. He defined what he meant by it so I can agree I fit that description.
-
-
No, no. I was just using him as example to show semantics can be important to him & I can accept his w/out it being important to me
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.