Sure but I don't see anything to be gained from arguing abt definitions when you could just get down to substance.
Does that actually work? Tried it for years. Tired of it now. Going with not identifying with the label but tackling the problem.
-
-
But it doesn't mean I have to argue with Michael. He defined what he meant by it so I can agree I fit that description.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
No, no. I was just using him as example to show semantics can be important to him & I can accept his w/out it being important to me
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.