so it's a mix of semantics and psychology. Does the author have a publicly accessible essay presenting the argument?
-
-
Replying to @Tweetophon @GodDoesnt
Resist the allure of reductionist synopses & actually read books. Then you are qualified to critique them.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @GodDoesnt
I read books, but I have standards. An accurate essay, as opposed to a bumbling description, would attract readers.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Tweetophon @GodDoesnt
You've no credibility. You criticise books you haven't read if you think they speak of God in ways u don't like
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @GodDoesnt
My criticisms are based on the presentation and author's own admissions & essays. Very credible!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Tweetophon @GodDoesnt
'Credible' means convincing to people other than yourself. You come across as petty, angry & dishonest.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @GodDoesnt
convincing enough last time to prompt plenty of hand-wringing and a defensive essay. Which I responded to in detail.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Tweetophon @GodDoesnt
Lol. Your perception of those events were very different to mine. I'm muting you. You're silly & self-important.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @GodDoesnt
I'm not credible, but you deny the author's admission, the essay he wrote, and the response given.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Tweetophon @GodDoesnt
You're delusional & it's stopped being funny. There's a reason no-one is listening to you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Sorry, forgot to untag you.Will do so now &mute him so I'm not tempted to waste any more time on him.Lives in alternative reality
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.