Huh, because the description says it discusses our motives for believing in God, "rather than debate the existence of God"
-
-
I read books, but I have standards. An accurate essay, as opposed to a bumbling description, would attract readers.
-
You've no credibility. You criticise books you haven't read if you think they speak of God in ways u don't like
-
My criticisms are based on the presentation and author's own admissions & essays. Very credible!
-
'Credible' means convincing to people other than yourself. You come across as petty, angry & dishonest.
-
convincing enough last time to prompt plenty of hand-wringing and a defensive essay. Which I responded to in detail.
-
Lol. Your perception of those events were very different to mine. I'm muting you. You're silly & self-important.
-
I'm not credible, but you deny the author's admission, the essay he wrote, and the response given.

-
You're delusional & it's stopped being funny. There's a reason no-one is listening to you.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.