Huh, because the description says it discusses our motives for believing in God, "rather than debate the existence of God"
It distinguishes God the alleged entity from 'God' what people are actually talking about.
-
-
so it's a mix of semantics and psychology. Does the author have a publicly accessible essay presenting the argument?
-
Resist the allure of reductionist synopses & actually read books. Then you are qualified to critique them.
-
I read books, but I have standards. An accurate essay, as opposed to a bumbling description, would attract readers.
-
You've no credibility. You criticise books you haven't read if you think they speak of God in ways u don't like
-
My criticisms are based on the presentation and author's own admissions & essays. Very credible!
-
'Credible' means convincing to people other than yourself. You come across as petty, angry & dishonest.
-
convincing enough last time to prompt plenty of hand-wringing and a defensive essay. Which I responded to in detail.
-
Lol. Your perception of those events were very different to mine. I'm muting you. You're silly & self-important.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.