.. I don't hold.
No, just seems to be saying there is something more valuable about humans as well.
-
-
There is (though "value" is perverse), but that doesn't follow straight away from ->
-
I'm very very bored now. There's nothing to be gained from discussing further.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm not any more. I'm going to leave it here.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's a silly tautology: Humans are smarter -> more valuable (value defined as being smart) ツ
-
I spent a very long time explaining why that absolutely isn't what's meant. ->
-
Hell, I know personally that Eve actually thinks we have direct duties to animals. No.
-
That in no way contradicts the notion that we are superior beings to animals.pic.twitter.com/xkFsWdcGOx
-
And we are *superior* to them in obvious ways (not in all ways). What's the issue?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.