Then you don't *literally* have an argument? A wink and a nudge is not an actual claim.
-
-
We know they do this. We see it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
To act in a manner appropriate to a lower form of being is inappropriate for a higher being.
@HPluckrose@iwpoe@DoneReasoning2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EveKeneinan
There is nothing unreasonable about that claim. It is true, in fact.
@HPluckrose@iwpoe@DoneReasoning1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EveKeneinan
If a human male went about humping legs like a male dog, it would be INAPPROPRIATE human conduct.
@HPluckrose@iwpoe@DoneReasoning4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EveKeneinan @DoneReasoning
Yes. Exactly. This is instinctively true. You, I, everyone (nearly) sees sexual displays as bestial - not human
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
No, certain KINDS of sexual displays are not befitting of rational animals.
@HPluckrose@DoneReasoning1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
-
Generally because they don't respect our rational natures at all- ergo we require consent comfort ->
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iwpoe @HPluckrose and
a reasonable amount of consideration for mutual preferences etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That's explainable ethics on the care/harm foundation. Eve is speaking of what is seemly.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.