It is entirely reasonable to expect human conduct of human beings, and not of irrational animals.
@HPluckrose @iwpoe @DoneReasoning
That's something we can discuss. Good & bad things result. Blank slatism? Denial of gender differences?
-
-
But also a desire to curb harmful impulses.
-
I mean, I don't think that follows from a disgust with animality as such. Even a trainer of horses->
-
thinks that you need to discipline the for their own good and for our use. It could but some ->
-
desire to avoid carnality isn't the only or even primary source of "opposing the body" so called.
-
Well, this argument came from a different direction anyway but I'm mostly speaking abt when it is expressed that way.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Well, I mean, Locke's tabula rasa follows from something he thinks about us not our immateriality.
-
I was thinking more of a denial of human nature generally. We can be constructed. No innate drives.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.