I’ll be pretty amazed if you find someone who denies ANY of those 3 propositions, much less ALL 3.
-
-
And unless the tendency to deny ALL 3 is extremely widespread, it would be absurd to call it “an instinct."
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
@iwpoe “An instinct to deny we are mammals” seems PATENTLY ABSURD as a claim about human beings.3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Lol. Referring to psychological denial of animal status. 'Animals' referred to as tho humans aren't.
5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Wish for privacy for certain biological functions. Dualism. Great chain of being. Bestial being negative etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Ppl don't literally deny mammalian properties. They can't. They present animal status, carnality, biology as bad
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Then you don't *literally* have an argument? A wink and a nudge is not an actual claim.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
We know they do this. We see it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
To act in a manner appropriate to a lower form of being is inappropriate for a higher being.
@HPluckrose@iwpoe@DoneReasoning2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Regarding yourself as a higher form of being than other mammals is a good example.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
If u just mean 'have a bigger brain, more advanced morality' etc not a separate kind of being from other mammals
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.