Only relatively. There are atheistic arguments that merit answers. Most are just non sequiturs or other absurdities
@HPluckrose @Sacerdotus
-
-
Replying to @EveKeneinan @Sacerdotus
You're probably not referring to ppl not raised with god-beliefs who've never seen any reason to adopt one?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Lockdown_Sol @DoneReasoning and
OK! I realised existence of God not that important to me but whether ppl can survive death of brain
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @DoneReasoning and
and go on to live in another form with self-awareness & experience suffering or joy.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @DoneReasoning and
It remains possible but no reason to think so & much reason to think 'self' is brain & dies w/ brain
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
James Lindsay's Life in Light of Death looks at transcendence narratives & instinct to deny that we're mammals
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This kind of intellectual dilettantism re religion is so common that you're blind to it. ->
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
It has nothing to do with religion. Religious and non-religious people do it. The book argues this.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.