Also, if someone argues against theism they are antitheists, not atheists. A- lack of Anti- opposition to
-
-
Replying to @IronPill87 @EveKeneinan
If someone argues against truth of theism, they are atheist. If they argue against merit of it, they are antitheist
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @EveKeneinan
You don't need to "argue against" theism in order to be atheist. Not believing it is enough to fit the definition.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IronPill87 @EveKeneinan
You don't, no, but that is what someone who does that is. They may not be against god- beliefs. Just think untrue.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
There are certainly many atheists who lack any good reasons for being such.
@HPluckrose@IronPill872 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
that is why I do not believe online atheists are really atheists. The substance is just not present.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
There's substance to disbelief?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Only relatively. There are atheistic arguments that merit answers. Most are just non sequiturs or other absurdities
@HPluckrose@Sacerdotus1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @EveKeneinan @Sacerdotus
You're probably not referring to ppl not raised with god-beliefs who've never seen any reason to adopt one?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Being raised in complete ignorance that China exists is not a good reason to affirm the non-existence of China.
@HPluckrose@Sacerdotus3 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
Atheists who've not been raised with god-belief & find it irrelevant to them tend not to do that.
-
-
So am an a-fermont's-theorem-ist and this is important to talk about regularly? Nifty worldview.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.