Also, if someone argues against theism they are antitheists, not atheists. A- lack of Anti- opposition to
-
-
Replying to @IronPill87 @EveKeneinan
If someone argues against truth of theism, they are atheist. If they argue against merit of it, they are antitheist
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @EveKeneinan
You don't need to "argue against" theism in order to be atheist. Not believing it is enough to fit the definition.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IronPill87 @EveKeneinan
You don't, no, but that is what someone who does that is. They may not be against god- beliefs. Just think untrue.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
There are certainly many atheists who lack any good reasons for being such.
@HPluckrose@IronPill872 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
that is why I do not believe online atheists are really atheists. The substance is just not present.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
There's substance to disbelief?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
no. I never found any, hence, my conversion from atheism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm not sure what substance you hoped to find in a disbelief.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Substance that backs the reasoning behind disbelief.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I see no need to argue abt it any more. You do you. I'll just oppose human rights abuses & inequality whether relig or secular.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.