Now people will take issue w/ 'intuitively' & point out that it's the opposite of reasonable but that wld be to focus on words too literally
-
-
-
What I mean is that relying on a natural tendency to need ideas to work & worry at them until I find what I need to change to make them work
-
actually produces sounder results for me than learning a lot about the steps, principles of logical reasoning etc. They don't sink in well.
-
So I'll never be an intensely logical thinker like some of the Vulcan-like philosophers/thinkers I talk to & admire.
-
But I'm OK with that as long as I have a fairly good success rate at seeing why my own ideas & other ppls don't add up in a conversation.
-
I want to be a Vulcan
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
or perhaps just more prone to confirmation bias..
-
No or I'd have said that.
-
wouldn't confirmation bias be indistinguishable from enhanced intuitive reasoning?
-
I don't see why but in any case, it is not what I am saying.
-
ok I misunderstood
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
perhaps it started to just become more natural
-
It's a different kind of thinking, I think, tho there is overlap. Maybe I'm just doing it my way & skipping some stuff!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
maybe it was just all that training before, and you are experiencing "muscle memory"?
-
Its a different kind of thinking, I think tho there is considerable overlap.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.