Which is essentially what the book says!God idea doesn't work. Typical atheist args against aren't helpful.
-
-
So, not that belief in God is irrational (the argument has been won anyway) it's that it doesn't 'work'?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's both. From what I understand, it's arguing we need to look at the phenomenon of religion differently.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
'We need to look at atheism differently because the argument for belief in God has been won.' See?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This wouldn't beg question either, it would just be a conditional claim. Unf, that premise is plainly false.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Plainly. If that's what you believe.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Are you a relativist? Do you take issue with evolution books working from the premise that evolution is true
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Is that what evolution books do?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes. Unless they're focused on the basic principles of evolution, they typically analyse its implications.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
DNA replication/mutation is a pretty big principle right? And yet http://theqstn.com/questions/188991/where-does-the-information-in-dna-come-from …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
This isn't really relevant to anything. I'm not sure a sensible discussion is going to happen here. Untag me, please.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @memneon
Will do. I have to get to work pretty quick here too.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.