I think we can understand universal liberalism & identity politics if we think of ppl as having three aspects & see which each favours. 1
-
-
However, it contains its own solution. When ppl are recognised as individuals & fellow humans, marginalisation by identity cannot occur. 6
-
The criticism of identity politics is that it fails to treat ppl as individuals, puts them in boxes & divides them from rest of humanity. 7
-
It perpetuates the problem it seeks to address. A margin is a boundary outside the main body & ID politics places groups there. 8
-
I think the right way to address marginalisation of groups is as a failure to uphold universal liberalism. 9
-
Which results from tribal identity politics whether its white nationalism, patriarchy or critical race theory or feminism.10
-
of behaviour. Some writers tend to over-empasise one or the other. 3/3
-
That's interesting.I'm unfamiliar with the idiographic-nomothetic debate but making observations abt how ppl see self &others
-
with everyone (nomothetic). 2/2
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.