@JTheMagicRobot they're not the same, but do have something in common. Government can't be everywhere & we wouldn't want it to
-
-
Replying to @Frankjl1980 @JTheMagicRobot
Yes, lots of things have things in common.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @JTheMagicRobot
ok. But we can't delude ourselves government can do everything re regulating behaviour
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
so if you're an anti-theist you essentially believe we don't need that regulating agent at some level
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
no as an atheist you simply don't believe in a deity, has nothing to do with regulating behaviour
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
atheists, if they're optimists, tend to also be anti-theists
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Frankjl1980 @MahdDogg
I think we've confused definitions (as usual.) Atheist - lacks belief in gods. Anti-theist - opposed to god-beliefs.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @MahdDogg
the that's what I said isn't it? I think there's de facto a link between the two if you're an optimist
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Frankjl1980 @MahdDogg
I'm primarily a sceptic so I am more interested in what is true than what I'd like to be true if I cld choose.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @MahdDogg
for me if I can establish we need a God for something that makes the possibility of one a reasonable one. Does not >
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
You'd need to know enough abt the universe & the nature of god to make this claim & then u'd have evidence of god
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.