it's not the fact that I happen to be able to do that thats invalidating.It's the fact that he'd try this tactic to discourage questions.2/2
-
-
-
Sometimes things can't be translated. This wasn't the case here. Both were very simple statements that could be. He was being obscurantist.
-
If someone who can explain their point simply chooses not to do so but make it unnecessarily inaccessible, we can know they're dishonest.
-
This cld deter a brilliant mathematician, physicist, philosopher who lacked those languages. Not the action of some1 who values truth.
-
Its the action of someone who knows their 'field' cannot stand up to scrutiny by intelligent truth-seekers & must be shrouded to survive.
-
As one professor of mine in college said: "...the actions of someone who wants to be admired rather than understood."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
