We are specifically talking abt the times in which it *does.* The times in which the intention *is* to restrict viewpoint diversity.https://twitter.com/barrydeutsch/status/809380151083417600 …
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
As I said at the start, there are some cases of no-platforming I disagree with. I just don't think it's bad in principle.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @barrydeutsch
Who does? You're arguing against things no-one is claiming.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
You don't think anyone is making broad-based claims that no-platforming is bad? Okay.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @barrydeutsch
.
@barrydeutsch I'm sure some1 has said."We want to discuss molecular dynamics.We must include hairdressers among speakers' but not case here1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
.
@barrydeutsch Someone else has probably said 'We must platform people who sacrifice virgins on stage cos that's free speech!' They're wrong1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @barrydeutsch
The convo here has *always* been abt encouraging diversity of ideas vs no-platforming ppl for being *controversial.*
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Constantly deflecting away from the point has just wasted a lot of time & got us nowhere.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.