Then I'm not trying to control what other ppl can hear because they have what I think are the 'wrong' ideas.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @KVeldman13
It's interesting that when a feminist writes an article about how others should speak, you say "authoritarian."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
But when you say that other people should speak in the way you prefer, that's somehow not authoritarian?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
If a student group wants to use college facilities to bring in Milo, so he can show the group a slideshow of pics of
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
local trans students, to make fun of their appearance and speculate on if he'd have sex with them... you may prefer
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
to "engage" with that so-called "idea," but the view that "this isn't an appropriate speaker for this community" is
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @barrydeutsch @KVeldman13
That's not an idea is it? If he wants to mock trans identity, that wld be. Targetting individuals is not.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @KVeldman13
But isn't this an admission, on your part, that people can be no-platformed for reasons other than ideas?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @barrydeutsch @KVeldman13
Absolutely! I'm defending free expression of ideas. Can ban, no-platform & prosecute for all sorts of other things
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @KVeldman13
In which case, you agree with me that no-platforming isn't always wrong, even if particular instances are wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, I do. I have been very specific abt what I object to. I think we need to leave it here.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.