Been told a few times lately that I need to reserve terms like 'denial of freedom of speech' 'authoritarian' & 'censorious' to law & gov.
-
-
It's certainly true that overuse or hyperbolic use of a word reduces its impact which is needed when serious human rights abuses happen.
-
However, laws & governments are determined by ppl & I think we need to address authoritarian & censorious ideas before they get that far
-
Telling someone they can't say some things, don't get to say some things, have wrong identity to say some things is not literally censorship
-
But it is a censorious attitude. And it can be argued with. And we do need the word 'censorious' to point out the problem.
-
Informal rules can be described as 'authoritarian' even if they have no legal power if they dictate restrictions rather than freedoms.
-
Because 'authoritarian' & 'libertarian' are adjectives on either end of a scale describing how much freedom we think ppl should have.
-
I'm confused. If I wrote this series of tweets I'd be shot down for manthreading so how come you're allowed to do it


-
Yep. The whole 'manthreading' nonsense has caused many ppl to call me the prime culprit. I'm sure you'll survive.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.