Its fine. But so many feminists claim it to be synonymous with the aim for gender equality as tho its not one-sided.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I think it's because the aim is ultimately equality, achieved with equity. Does that make sense?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TransKidRage
Yes as long as men's rights activism also seen this way & gender equality activism of ppl like me who come from both sides.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
But men don't need activist groups vouching specifically for them. There are other groups, BLM, pro-LGBT, etc etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TransKidRage
That simply isn't true & its what can happen if you only come at gender equality from the perspective of one gender!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @TransKidRage
MGM. Education gap. Homelessness. Suicide. Custody rights. Military draft. Crime sentencing. Issues men face coz they're men.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
W/ things like the military, those would b the result of misogyny which men felt the brunt of. But I get what you're saying.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TransKidRage
Men & women have shaped society & built gender roles. Currently looking at women's roles in propaganda of the crusades.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
do you personally believe in gender and/or gender roles?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TransKidRage
I do * not* support prescribed gender roles. Recently made this.pic.twitter.com/nBPVfO4XeO
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
In response to ppl arguing for ' traditional' gender roles, obviously. Only the individual knows what is right for them.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.