Feminism is not for men. It's not 'sexist' to have a movement dedicated to women. Things have individual purposes, if you haven't noticed.
-
-
Replying to @TransKidRage
Its fine. But so many feminists claim it to be synonymous with the aim for gender equality as tho its not one-sided.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I think it's because the aim is ultimately equality, achieved with equity. Does that make sense?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TransKidRage
Yes as long as men's rights activism also seen this way & gender equality activism of ppl like me who come from both sides.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
But men don't need activist groups vouching specifically for them. There are other groups, BLM, pro-LGBT, etc etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TransKidRage
That simply isn't true & its what can happen if you only come at gender equality from the perspective of one gender!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @TransKidRage
MGM. Education gap. Homelessness. Suicide. Custody rights. Military draft. Crime sentencing. Issues men face coz they're men.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @TransKidRage
Feminists don't have to address these issues but other forms of gender equality activism do.Feminism not the only show in town
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
That's kinda what I meant. Usually the factors in these things r sexuality, class, race etc. so there's something else already.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Class, race, sexuality etc can all be bigger factors for an individual but looking at disadvantages ppl face for being M or F.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.