Or perhaps they have empathy for the 6 suffering from organ failure & rationalise that dead ppl can't suffer so better overall.
-
-
-
Replying to @toxicpath
Yes. Is one person dead better or worse than six people suffering horribly?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I'd say they are independent instances of well-being that can not be compared.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
why is it logical to sum up the morality of groups like it had units?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @toxicpath
Because they do. Groups are made up of individual people. People are the focus of our aim for an objective morality.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
we are not talking about a physical law or measurable units.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @toxicpath
Why not? I thought it was individuals - units - you were concerned about. Also justifying rationally, you said.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
all you have to do is show that the system works as intended. We obviously don't harvest organs because society wouldn't work
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Why not? If we agreed that was moral, it would work like that. Can we leave it now please?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.