Whereas 6 people were suffering & one person was well, now 6 people are well & one is dead but not suffering. The moral choice.
-
-
I'm pretty sure now the problem is approaching this like physics and not like biology, which it is after all.
-
I have no physics. Arguing for maximising well-being and different perspectives on this.
-
we argue that maximizing well-being is a better goal. That's all you need to do.
-
But we'd have to accept different perspectives on this exist and we need to argue for them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
not really. It can include historical contrivances and just random luck. Logic has nothing to do with it.
-
OK, well you've now ruled out logic so you'll have to argue why its best to do that. Do you see my point? Many possible premises.
-
I don't think there are many if you claim your goal is moral.
-
Then I have failed to show how different arguments would work for maximising wellbeing in different ways. Thought I was clear.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.