Yes, I am talking specifically abt deciding who private companies can & can't host on their shows/stages/social media etc.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I think somehow companies have more responsibility than people, because of their potential impact
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DerekGT
But they might not think so. And if we claim to respect diversity of ideas, we cannot insist they do it our way.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
at the end of the day, it's a decision as to how many rights we give companies. They already don't have same rights
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DerekGT
But we're talking abt freedom of expression now. I will advocate it consistently.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
and hate speech is still hate speech. I would argue we should be even stricter on that. Certain people should be banned for that
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DerekGT
You either uphold freedom of expression or not. Can't say everyone except universities & ppl who use what I think of as hate speech
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I think freedom of expression you're advocating is a company's right to certain image, not individuals' right to speak anywhere
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DerekGT
I don't support individual's right to speak anywhere. That would be disastrous. I support free exchange of ideas in some places.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
what I'm saying is it isn't a free exchange of ideas if they're banning people. A company isn't a person.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Of course not. A company can choose whether or not to uphold the principle of free speech.pic.twitter.com/SWlbDCZtD2
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.