not if it's a monopoly that we have no way to boycott.Turing Pharmaceuticals has patent or closed distribution on necessary meds
Because its authoritarian & they can't possibly host everything everyone thinks is important.
-
-
as far as authoritarian goes, I guess it depends on what you think is accepable or necessary. We have to have some laws.
-
Yes, I am talking specifically abt deciding who private companies can & can't host on their shows/stages/social media etc.
-
I think somehow companies have more responsibility than people, because of their potential impact
-
But they might not think so. And if we claim to respect diversity of ideas, we cannot insist they do it our way.
-
at the end of the day, it's a decision as to how many rights we give companies. They already don't have same rights
-
But we're talking abt freedom of expression now. I will advocate it consistently.
-
and hate speech is still hate speech. I would argue we should be even stricter on that. Certain people should be banned for that
-
And who decides what that is? Some think its atheists criticising Islam or one kind of feminist criticising another.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think people would react a lot better to "public voted to have X speak instead of everyone else" over "we banned Y and Z"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.