Sure. Companies can choose to support freedom of expression of not. We can then evaluate the company based on the decisions it makes.https://twitter.com/sherlockmichael/status/807124916239634436 …
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
not if it's a monopoly that we have no way to boycott.Turing Pharmaceuticals has patent or closed distribution on necessary meds
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DerekGT
I'm talking about whether its reasonable to criticise private companies for their decisions re: freedom of speech or not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
my stance has previously been to let them do whatever they want, but now I'm unsure. Without equality, it leads to imbalance
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DerekGT
THis is a different issue to whether or not private companies which platform talks shld be required to allow free speech
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
sort of mirrors private businesses refusing service. Not everyone has opportunity to seek other service, creating inequality
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
No. A science conference does not have to host creationists. Or basket weavers. It can talk abt science & invite certain scientists
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.