...then you are arguing for the principle of free speech. Even whilst acknowledging their right not to uphold it.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @knwledgepursuer
In such case I would call it differently to avoid confusion. Free Speech has a tradition not to be messed with
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
How about: Because of your goals, please provide a range of interesting opinions. Opinion X may be interesting
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drMajMaj @knwledgepursuer
No, honestly. I'm just fine w/ principle of free expression of ideas & not censoring any known as freedom of spchpic.twitter.com/8vG58JM1uB
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @knwledgepursuer
Then you may need different words for North Korea Long tradition is: "Free Speech" = "State stay out of it"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drMajMaj @knwledgepursuer
I wrote this which addresses the 'Freedom of speech as law' vs 'freedom of speech as principle' thing.pic.twitter.com/1f2FvSfVBm
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @knwledgepursuer
I think we essentially agree on the substance - I may have semantic pet peeves that are too long for twitter.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Perhaps bc of background, I am inclined to invoke "Free Speech" as last resort, and keep it as taboo otherwise
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drMajMaj @knwledgepursuer
I don't know what that means. You either support free exchange of ideas in places for exchanging ideas or not.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @knwledgepursuer
'Support for X' ≠ 'Support whatever rules _enforcing_ X" Frankly, I am more on your side than it may seem.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't know what that means either. I am quite prepared to believe we share many core values!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.