It still isn't.We're not excluding them for what they say but what they might vote in, how they might live & affect others
Why do you need to ally with one lot of theocrats to prevent other theocrats from taking over?
-
-
Why can't we just oppose theocracy. In fact, we do, & this works coz don't have many religious people.pic.twitter.com/c6DuiyQssU
-
You can, I'm just saying anti-theocrat numbers may not be sufficient on their own.
@knwledgepursuer -
I don't know what you mean. The small number of theocrats we have cld never have power cos ppl don't value them.
-
To keep theocracy out, we need a majority of people supporting liberal secular democracy.
-
I guess my hypothesising works better in US, not in Uk. Sorry, should have thought more b4 butting in.
@knwledgepursuer -
I just don't understand it.I can see that in a crisis secular liberals cld ally with 1 theocracy to stop a worse
-
But this would still be a problem to be solved &we'd still have to try to make secular liberal democracy dominant
-
That wanting something & having the numbers to get it are different things.
@knwledgepursuer - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
principles /2
@knwledgepursuer -
Whose voice? We don't have many religious voices. They get overruled in democracy quite well.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Because in a democracy your voice isn't necessarily sufficient to keep out those who don't align with your /1
@knwledgepursuerThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.