We can then evaluate them on how they do so. Freedom of speech is one criteria.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @drMajMaj and
eg, a science conference cld reasonably insist that only scientists speak.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @drMajMaj and
Freedom of speech is less important than relevance in this situation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @drMajMaj and
However, we might want freedom of speech on social media forums & pick ones which offer that.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
And if they ban someone for offensive views (which is their right) they should be strongly criticised
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Surely anyone can be criticized. But not on grounds of 'free speech', if it something else.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drMajMaj @knwledgepursuer
It depends on whether or not your criticism is that their institution wld benefit from principle of free speech.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If your criticism is that certain views are being banned in a place u'd like to see a free exchange of them...
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
...then you are arguing for the principle of free speech. Even whilst acknowledging their right not to uphold it.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @knwledgepursuer
In such case I would call it differently to avoid confusion. Free Speech has a tradition not to be messed with
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I know it does! It was a principle argued for way before it was a law! Why I wrote this:pic.twitter.com/dstCtr2iQ6
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.