I disagree. Freedom of expression does not, and should not, force/oblige private companies to offer platforms to those they'd rather not.https://twitter.com/knwledgepursuer/status/807123394902704128 …
It depends on whether or not your criticism is that their institution wld benefit from principle of free speech.
-
-
If your criticism is that certain views are being banned in a place u'd like to see a free exchange of them...
-
...then you are arguing for the principle of free speech. Even whilst acknowledging their right not to uphold it.
-
In such case I would call it differently to avoid confusion. Free Speech has a tradition not to be messed with
-
How about: Because of your goals, please provide a range of interesting opinions. Opinion X may be interesting
-
No, honestly. I'm just fine w/ principle of free expression of ideas & not censoring any known as freedom of spchpic.twitter.com/8vG58JM1uB
-
Then you may need different words for North Korea Long tradition is: "Free Speech" = "State stay out of it"
-
I wrote this which addresses the 'Freedom of speech as law' vs 'freedom of speech as principle' thing.pic.twitter.com/1f2FvSfVBm
-
I think we essentially agree on the substance - I may have semantic pet peeves that are too long for twitter.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.