I can support arguments for allowing everyone access to a place of debate & not to a country.
-
-
My concern is just making sure RELEVANT(environment appropriate) views are not being censored/punished
-
Exactly. So if we try to apply freedom of speech principles to things which have many other factors, doesn't work.
-
I wouldn't regard talking about 'basket-weaving at medical conventions' as a free speech issue though
-
It was one that was brought up to justify no-platforming certain feminists. U wldn't have non-scientists speak at sci conf
-
I agree, the only related free speech issue with a science conf. would be no-platforming a scientist due to offensive theories
-
Yes. Ppl try to apply it where the actual issue is something else. Here relevance not offence.
-
Re: immigration, concern abt changing culture & law caused by illiberal voters, not whether what they say is offensive.
-
Offence wouldn't be the issue but PUNISHMENT for opinions if an individual illiberal immigrant was denied citizenship would be
- 27 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Have to think: Is this a place ppl shld be able to say what they like. Eg a country, a public forum, a university.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.