I disagree. Freedom of expression does not, and should not, force/oblige private companies to offer platforms to those they'd rather not.https://twitter.com/knwledgepursuer/status/807123394902704128 …
-
-
-
-
We agree. Platforms cannot be forced to include every view. They must be able to pick.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @drMajMaj and
We can then evaluate them on how they do so. Freedom of speech is one criteria.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @drMajMaj and
eg, a science conference cld reasonably insist that only scientists speak.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @drMajMaj and
Freedom of speech is less important than relevance in this situation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @drMajMaj and
However, we might want freedom of speech on social media forums & pick ones which offer that.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @drMajMaj and
Universities could offer platforms only to people with qualifications & expertise on topics.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @drMajMaj and
Few people would complain that a platform to talk abt the economy not offered to everyone.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
But if it's platforming feminists but bans Germaine Greer & Christina Hoff Sommers, they would.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @drMajMaj and
On grounds of principle of freedom of speech among knowledgable ppl they want from a university
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.