Pro-life comes from the care-harm foundation usually but ppl think it comes from the authority/subversion so they can't address it.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Yes, true. But I'm not sure you need need empathy to realise this.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @oreil_m
I do. Perhaps other people can work it out intellectually & analytically.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Would Haidt's data not be sufficient for you to change your approach when communicating with political opponents?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @oreil_m
I don't understand? Not without empathy. It gave me empathy coz it enabled me to see things as coming from a good place.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @oreil_m
He doesn't have data on specific interactions that I have. He just gave me an understanding which allowed me to communicate better.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I see what you mean. I read a few pieces on effective communications recently. But many on the left see it as tone policing
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @oreil_m
Yes, they do. They make take the consequences of their tone.pic.twitter.com/dq10U08rtV
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @oreil_m
*must take. But quite often you can even mollify those ones have a productive conversation. Well, sometimes.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @oreil_m
But I don't know what to call that process of trying to get into other ppl's heads & make a conversation work coz it is emotional.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
But its not taken over by emotion. Still driven by same principles & same aim to get ppl to shift a bit from an extreme position.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.