Unless the person is selling the use of their own body for some purpose, obv. That's the 'slavery' line.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Not unless. Slavery is illegal even if the subject desires that form of subjugation.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @lubelluledotcom
Someone simply isn't a slave if they are selling the work or use of their own body & keeping the money.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Capitalism is about the exploitation of the human. Monetary exchange does not indicate "less abuse".
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lubelluledotcom
Then you have a problem with capitalism. Ppl selling any service or product for personal gain. Not sex-work.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Prostitution is slavery. You cannot justify it just because of money. Sorry, but it doesn't work that way.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @lubelluledotcom
If you think prostitution is a special case, you need to explain what makes this manual service so different from any other
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @lubelluledotcom
If your only argument is 'Prostitution is slavery. That's how it works' it fails. Why isn't roadsweeping slavery?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @lubelluledotcom
Usually, it comes down to 'Because sex is different. More personal.' And that's a personal evaluation not an objective one.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Slavery is different, yes. You cannot make demands on the human body and dignity in an era where females are paid substantially
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
No. No-one must be allowed to demand a woman provide sex. Only she can decide that. Women earn more in sex-work.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.