Even if this were true, they can't. You don't need to belong to anything to be an atheist. Its just a word that means 'disbeliever in gods'https://twitter.com/MondigeStudent/status/806214749130227712 …
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
you don't think the word can be hijacked to mean some identity? People have a perception of atheists already, anti is consistent
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DerekGT
Yes, I do. I'm arguing that this is a problem coz then you go claiming ppl aren't true atheists if they have different values.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I know it's not exactly the same, since feminism is complex, and etymology just means "pro-female" vs. "No god"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DerekGT @HPluckrose
but it could be a symptom of the losing battle of words and what they mean, eg. "Literally" now means "figuratively"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, exactly. If a word changes meaning, we have to accept this. I'll just say I don't believe in gods when this is relevant.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.