The point of categorizing is not to condemn people but to show diversity so everyone feels welcome & can live in the same house.
-
-
Replying to @DeMondige @HPluckrose
But choose not to and you risk the tribalisation of atheism as pure anti-theism, the opposite you want.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DeMondige
.@MondigeStudent I don't risk anything. Let people choose their own labels or tribes or not. The end.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
The world is less voluntaristic as you wish it to be. Heck, I wish it wasn't that way. But I accept human psychology.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DeMondige
OK, well those people who 'feel unable' to choose their own labels and tribes can either grow a backbone or not.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
It is hard to grow a backbone if anti-theists start calling you a fake atheist because you do not share their opinion.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DeMondige
And? Why should I care about what a bunch of dogmatics - that attitude would show them dogmatic - think?
@HPluckrose1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Dragonblaze
Because the dogmatics rule, that's what religion tells us atheists.
@HPluckrose3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DeMondige
I've been called fake this, that or the other already. I simply pay no attention to such attempts.
@HPluckrose1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Dragonblaze
I think we shouldn't bow our head in silence. I think anti-theists should know the atheistic house is not theirs.
@HPluckrose2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
You argue with them for saying u shldn't be defined as atheists as Im arguing w/ u for saying they shldn't be.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.