Well, it is. Reputation for balance, honesty & integrity matters to many people. You can tell me it shouldn't but it does
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
If I’ve learnt anyth in
#journalism, it’s that *everyb* has a blind spot like that. Even w that factored in, GG is above avg.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
Well, he'll only lose credibility for the people who are interested in the area of his blind spot then.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Why do you suppose that loss of credibility shld spill over into other areas? That’s the weird thing: for many ppl, it doesn’t.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Well, w those who are uncritical across the board, it does. But for those who know how to be critical, I have no explanation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
.
@PeterMonnerjahn I'm surprised you think it unusual for ppl to doubt someone's integrity more widely once its been shown lacking in 1 area.5 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
+…Whatever sb’s track record is, the next piece must again be judged by how well you can check it. There is no other standard.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
Not claiming there is. But ppl learn from experience and reputation, once damaged, is hard to recover.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
+…a spotless record of integrity mean the next piece will be flawless, nor does an instance of a lack of integrity mean the opp.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It doesn't know. If a man beats his first three girlfriends, the next might be perfectly safe. Still advise her to avoid.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.