Yes. Point is that @guardian was not able to see that this article is indistinguishable from a hoax.
OK, we'll leave it then. My point is that different language is used by the satirist than by the genuine apologist.
-
-
Possibly with forensic type analysis. I'm pretty good at spotting it, but suspect average fundie remains blissfully oblivious.
@HPluckrose -
Point is that believing in an ideology against all reason, evidence and just plain common sense causes a sort of brain damage...
@HPluckrose -
You go make that point then. I'm sure it will be very helpful in fixing the problem.
-
Ridicule, severe psychological trauma, electroshock therapy, might help those who can't recognise satire at their own expense...
@HPluckrose -
You unfollowed me? Because I think
@ggreenwald is irredeemable? (At least through ordinary conversation...)@HPluckrose -
I blocked&unblocked to make you unfollow me.I'd like to hear less from you.Discussions unproductive.Also made me unfollow you
-
Sorry. I rather enjoyed following you...
@HPluckrose -
I'm sorry, Peter. We have different approaches. You're a bit of a bulldozer & I'm 2 tired & low on patience to be flattened.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.