This is because you put everyone who criticises your misrepresentation of SH into a tribe of your enemies.
-
-
Well, w those who are uncritical across the board, it does. But for those who know how to be critical, I have no explanation.
-
.
@PeterMonnerjahn I'm surprised you think it unusual for ppl to doubt someone's integrity more widely once its been shown lacking in 1 area. -
people don't have time to fact check everything someone writes, so if someone so obv shames himself thus...
-
... It does cast doubt on other things they say
-
I'm not sure that's an emotional reaction as much as learning from experience.
-
But how do you learn from experience? Most ppl’d say: induction. But that’s just wrong. Cf: http://www.theopensociety.net/2011/10/science-learning-from-experience …
@calciferion -
We judge ppl by their previous actions! If you lend someone money & they don't pay it back, don't lend again!
-
Yes, we want to learn by experience. But if we think we do so by induction, that’s just bad thinking. Not the same.
@calciferion - 17 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Except, of course, the critical faculties being overridden by the emotion circuits. Don’t know how helpful that is…
-
Obv, if your experience is that all journalists have one area in which they misrepresent, smear & obsess over something...
-
...you won't be put off by someone doing this but will hold them as credible as everyone else.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.