Sorry if I misread you. I thought you just said you do that.
Not by mine. But I know religious ppl define 'morality' as whatever their god says it is.
-
-
You can believe in your gods, and i in mine. we'll find out who's right when we're dead.
-
That's not the issue under discussion tho. The issue is whether or not its OK to punish people solely for thinking differently
-
It's absolutely NOT o.k. for humans to do that. It absolutely IS o.k. for any supreme being or cosmic event to do that.
-
Morality is relative? Whether or not something is wrong depends on who does it? Like racism = bad. 'Reverse' racism = fine.
-
It's absolutely relative between human vs. supreme beings or giant asteroids
-
if the supreme being is a racist, racism is moral by definition.
-
By the definition in which God defines morality. Obviously, ppl who don't define morality this way would still think immoral.
-
She cares less about what you think is moral than I care about what the fire ants I poisoned this a.m. think is moral
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Doesn't equate to doxing or employer calling or physical harmful acts.
-
No, it equates to *justifying* doxing or employer-calling or physical harmful acts.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
..and as such I have no problem with religious people believing whatever they want about the judgement of their supreme being
-
OK. I, on the other hand, don't make exceptions for god-related values when I evaluate the ethics of values.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
or irreligious believing in nothing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.