Why? If a Buddist thinks I'd be more enlightened if I believed her way, why should I disapprove?
I'm talking abt ppl who explicitly *justify* eternal torture for ppl who don't share their beliefs. Say its morally good.
-
-
You're talking about "torture" done by a supreme being? Yes, supreme beings by definition define morality.
-
Not by mine. But I know religious ppl define 'morality' as whatever their god says it is.
-
You can believe in your gods, and i in mine. we'll find out who's right when we're dead.
-
That's not the issue under discussion tho. The issue is whether or not its OK to punish people solely for thinking differently
-
It's absolutely NOT o.k. for humans to do that. It absolutely IS o.k. for any supreme being or cosmic event to do that.
-
Morality is relative? Whether or not something is wrong depends on who does it? Like racism = bad. 'Reverse' racism = fine.
-
It's absolutely relative between human vs. supreme beings or giant asteroids
-
if the supreme being is a racist, racism is moral by definition.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.