I was explaining the two positions I was referring to.
-
-
-
Replying to @StphnEdn
Yes. But my tweet was responding to yours asking who I meant by 'et al.' You have moved into partial defence of position B?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Reasonable conversations can & must be had abt how to balance necessary criticism of Islam & counter anti-Muslim bigotry.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I think supporting & amplifying liberal & reforming Muslims addressing the problems in Islam is best way to do both.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
But maybe I misread ur first tweet causing us to be at cross-purposes.Thought u saying hard to tell satire from extreme views
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I was saying in that tweet that the article was only obviously fake if the possibility it was written by someone prone to ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @StphnEdn @HPluckrose
...extremism was ignored. This seemed unreasonable seeing as it was ostensibly part confession of past extremism
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @StphnEdn
That's why I responded arguing that language of satire from anti-regressive stance v diff to language of real regressive.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.