.@pierbove @GodfreyElfwick @ImLiterallyBen A deeper point though: The fact people are legitimately buying this says a lot about the piece.
-
-
Yeah, definitely plausible. The reason I don't buy it is lack of conclusive evidence.
-
Sure. I'm still going with it being tongue-in-cheek rather than sincere tho.
-
Discerning truth from satire online is like trying to find out how many layers deep the poison chalice swap went.pic.twitter.com/vKmWdvmHkO
-
Yeah but I think if it had really intended to make the argument wld have been some stuff abt hating Muslims
-
rather than 'diplomatically expressed negative sentiments abt Islam.' Wld have been just as easy.
-
That's a good point.
-
And "We shld be able to discuss these things w/out being called racist & bigot.' Regressive left pretends that's OK
-
It says 'Criticism & discussion of Islam is fine. Demonising muslims isn't.' Then calls examples of 1st the 2nd.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
However, this cld make lots of ppl ask 'was this you?' & it seem funny to say 'yes!'
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.