I think if that was their aim, they wouldn't have gone about it like they did.
-
-
Replying to @nevynxxx
I don't know what you mean?Aim was to protest celebrating the lives of Brit soldiers coz of the Muslim casualties of Brit soldiers
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Then protest Britan's involvment. Protest the people who put the soldiers there. Not the soldiers who don't have a choice.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nevynxxx
I agree but we're talking abt the right to say what we think whether or not what we think is right.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I'm not disagreeing with that right. I'm disagreeing with the line where that "right" becomes a thin veil to cover violence.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nevynxxx
Violence must be prosecuted. But violence is an actual thing which can be seen. Its not words.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @nevynxxx
A violent protest against Brit soldiers in East was Lee Rigby killing. Chanting & burning symbols is *right* way to protest.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @nevynxxx
That's where we disagree then. I think too far is violence or destruction of property etc. Not chanting & burning symbols.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Which is fine. I'm not trying to convince you otherwise. Just offering my opinion.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You're allowed to try to convince me otherwise. You haven't tho coz I see issues on which I'd want to protest in this way.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.