If we want to be able to say things which upset, eg religious ppl, have to defend offending other 'sacred' ideas
But a lot of activism doesn't help. I don't think we can evaluate that way - will your protest achieve your aims.
-
-
I'm sure Democrat protest on the Trump election didn't help but they must still be able to do it as long as no violence or crime
-
The "no crime" bit that's hard when discussing what law should be ;) Gets a bit circular...
-
Obviously, I'm arguing it shouldn't become a crime to march, speak or safely burn symbols.
-
And I don't disagree with that argument. Just that specific example of it.
-
That's the problem! If it be OK to do it in one case but not another, this is not freedom of expression.
-
It is a problem! It's one I don't have an answer to.
-
I'm getting feeling you'd like to leave it. You're not such a naturally argumentative person as me! Reached an impasse anyway. :)
-
LOL, yes. We are going around in circles a bit now ;)
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.