@Liam_Smith1990 So no, I don't think you should for that, but doing it in a mosque during their prayers..That's a different line @HPluckrose
-
-
Which I agree with. I think the article you mention goes beyond that though, it was harassment. It was intended that way.
-
It didn't target an individual but a ceremony. As Kevin said:https://twitter.com/KevinOnEarth/status/803593361315794945 …
-
I think if that was their aim, they wouldn't have gone about it like they did.
-
I don't know what you mean?Aim was to protest celebrating the lives of Brit soldiers coz of the Muslim casualties of Brit soldiers
-
Then protest Britan's involvment. Protest the people who put the soldiers there. Not the soldiers who don't have a choice.
-
I agree but we're talking abt the right to say what we think whether or not what we think is right.
-
No, I'm saying your example was bad.
-
The example doesn't matter. Ppl cld be protesting remembrance day or carrots being orange. Its whether they have right to
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The down side to giving people power, is expecting them to use it responsibly. I don't think that was a reasonable use.
-
I do. A peaceful protest is the right way to air your grievance. Even if we don't think it justified. I want to be able to do that
-
I don't call that peaceful.
-
Can we chant & burn things safely?
-
Yes! Have already said that multiple times!
-
So what wasn't peaceful?
-
I think they were attempting to incite violence. It obviously didn't work. But I think that is the intention.
-
Look at what the judge said. What at what he found them guilty of. Insulting the dead etc
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't think it's wrong to attempt to police that reasonable use. But it's very difficult, and must be carefully monitored.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.